ReviewCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Machine Learning-Augmented Precision Dosing: Integrating Pharmacokinetic Modeling With Clinical Decision Support.
Review in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inter-individual variability in drug exposure can lead to ineffective therapy or toxicity, particularly in vulnerable patients. Routine model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) relies mainly on population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models, Bayesian forecasting, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has a complementary role in extrapolation to special populations, evaluation of drug-drug interactions, and simulation of unobserved scenarios, but it remains uncommon for bedside dose adjustment. Machine learning (ML) may provide additional support when critical illness, organ dysfunction, or polypharmacy creates complex nonlinear relationships. The increasing availability of electronic health records, real-world data, and high-dimensional biomedical datasets has accelerated interest in ML for precision dosing. ML can support exposure prediction, limited-sampling AUC estimation, outcome-risk stratification, and monitoring prioritization. Its clinical role depends on the decision target, the availability of concentration data, and whether pharmacological constraints are retained within the modeling architecture. This review covers direct prediction models, limited-sampling AUC estimators, hybrid pharmacometric-ML models, neural ordinary differential equation approaches, and reinforcement learning for sequential dose decisions. We examine data sources, feature engineering, validation, reporting, and governance across glycopeptides, beta-lactams, polymyxins, triazole antifungals, and immunosuppressants. We also describe a staged clinical workflow in which concentration measurements and mechanistic models are used to calibrate data-driven predictions, and we identify the evidence needed for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.