Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902867›Full record

ReviewCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Machine Learning-Augmented Precision Dosing: Integrating Pharmacokinetic Modeling With Clinical Decision Support.

Yunmeng Pang, Bingqi Zhang, Zhiqiu He, Yuliu Li, Jiaxin Yu, Wei Zuo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yunmeng PangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0003-2976-0169
Bingqi ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0009-6355-0564
Zhiqiu HeDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0006-6221-5447
Yuliu LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8466-5314
Jiaxin YuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0000-8058-8390
Wei ZuoDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1760-4009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inter-individual variability in drug exposure can lead to ineffective therapy or toxicity, particularly in vulnerable patients. Routine model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) relies mainly on population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models, Bayesian forecasting, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has a complementary role in extrapolation to special populations, evaluation of drug-drug interactions, and simulation of unobserved scenarios, but it remains uncommon for bedside dose adjustment. Machine learning (ML) may provide additional support when critical illness, organ dysfunction, or polypharmacy creates complex nonlinear relationships. The increasing availability of electronic health records, real-world data, and high-dimensional biomedical datasets has accelerated interest in ML for precision dosing. ML can support exposure prediction, limited-sampling AUC estimation, outcome-risk stratification, and monitoring prioritization. Its clinical role depends on the decision target, the availability of concentration data, and whether pharmacological constraints are retained within the modeling architecture. This review covers direct prediction models, limited-sampling AUC estimators, hybrid pharmacometric-ML models, neural ordinary differential equation approaches, and reinforcement learning for sequential dose decisions. We examine data sources, feature engineering, validation, reporting, and governance across glycopeptides, beta-lactams, polymyxins, triazole antifungals, and immunosuppressants. We also describe a staged clinical workflow in which concentration measurements and mechanistic models are used to calibrate data-driven predictions, and we identify the evidence needed for clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMachine LearningModels, BiologicalPharmacokineticsBayes TheoremDrug MonitoringHumansPrecision MedicinePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsSoft Computingindividualized dosingmachine learningmodel‐informed precision dosingpharmacokineticsreal‐world datatherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42902867
PMCPMC13684060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.