Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902852›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026

Correlation of Radial and Ulnar Shaft Bowing Using the 3D Central Line Method.

Christoph Zindel, Sylvano Mania, Tudor Trache, Michel Meisterhans, Julian Hasler, Lisa Reissner, Andreas Schweizer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christoph ZindelDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-9824
Sylvano ManiaDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4844-5351
Tudor TracheDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michel MeisterhansDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-3877
Julian HaslerDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8237-1611
Lisa ReissnerDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4291-3759
Andreas SchweizerDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forearm rotation depends on the multiplanar bowing of the radius and ulna. Despite the importance of the fundamental 3D anatomic understanding of the forearm for fracture fixation or implant design, all morphological studies have applied only two-dimensional methods rather than analyzing the true full 3D space. No study investigated the intra-pair relation of ulna/radius either. Therefore, we processed CT scans of 30 healthy forearms into 3D models. Each bone was divided into 10 segments along the rotation axis, creating 11 cross-sections with central points. Connecting these central points yielded the Central-Line. Bowing was quantified as the Bowing-Index (area under the Central-Line). Bowing was analyzed in ap, sagittal and the newly defined Main-Deformity-Axis (MDA) plane. Maximal radial deviation averaged 6.4 ± 2.3 mm in frontal, 1.3 ± 3.3 mm sagittal, and 7.2 ± 1.8 mm in MDA plane over all forearms. Maximal ulnar deviation was greater with 8.2 ± 2.9 mm frontal, 9.5 ± 1.7 mm sagittal, and 12.3 ± 2.1 mm in MDA. MDA orientation angle (angular tilt in the dorso-radial direction in the axial plane) was dorso-radial, with significantly larger out-of-plane bowing in the ulna (60.4° vs. 15.0°; p < 0.01), yielding an average intra-bone-pair-difference of 45.5° ± 33.0°. A negative correlation was found between radius and ulna MDA angles (r = -0.40, p = 0.030). The Bowing Index was higher in the ulna across all planes (p ≤ 0.011), with a significant negative correlation between Ulna and Radius (MDA plane, r = -0.38, p = 0.036). Distal ulna analysis revealed consistent dorsal and slight ulnar tilt. The Central Line Method enables 3D characterization of forearm bowing, identifying deformity planes beyond frontal/sagittal axes. For the first time, significant negative correlations between radial and ulnar bowing were demonstrated. These insights hold clinical relevance for fracture fixation, osteotomy planning, and implant design.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalRadiusUlnaAdultFemaleForearmHumansMaleRotationTomography, X-Ray Computedbowingcentral line methodforearmradiusulna

Identifiers

PMID42902852
PMCPMC13684049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.