Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902451›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026

Baseline Performance and the 72-Hour Performance Window Following Plyometric Withdrawal in Collegiate Sprinters.

Hao Du, Jingkun Zhou, Yuxiang Liu, Lei Yang, Yonggang Luo, Shuai Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hao DuSchool of Humanities and Physical Education, Hebei Oriental College, Langfang, Hebei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4423-0768
Jingkun ZhouSchool of Arts and Physical Education, Huanghe Science and Technology College, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7740-1900
Yuxiang LiuSchool of Physical Education, Langfang Normal University, Langfang, Hebei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2214-6939
Lei YangSchool of Humanities and Physical Education, Hebei Oriental College, Langfang, Hebei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0408-3509
Yonggang LuoPhysical Education Department, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5829-4281
Shuai YangEmilio Aguinaldo College, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7160-1575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plyometric studies emphasise pre-post change, but coaches need to know what remains after the block ends. This single-cohort study followed 26 collegiate sprinters through 12 weeks of Monday plyometric training and 4 weeks of withdrawal, without a parallel control group. During intervention, 30 m sprint time and arm-assisted countermovement jump (CMJ) height were measured at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h; 0 and 72 h were retained during withdrawal. Mixed models showed large week effects for sprint, F(1, 1534) = 2272.01, partial η

Indexed as

Athletic PerformancePlyometric ExerciseRunningFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsYoung Adultcountermovement jumpmicrocycleplyometric trainingsprint performancetraining withdrawal

Identifiers

PMID42902451
PMCPMC13683558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.