Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902381›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2026

Comparative validation and local adaptation of gastric cancer risk assessment models in a large multicenter endoscopic screening cohort in China.

Xue Li, Ying Chen, Juan Zhu, Wei-Yan Yu, Huan-Qing Tao, Gang Chen, Hui-Zhang Li, Ling-Bin Du

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xue Li *Department of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Ying Chen *Department of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Juan Zhu *Department of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Wei-Yan YuDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Huan-Qing TaoDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Hui-Zhang LiDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Ling-Bin DuDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China. dulb@zjcc.org.cn.

Funding

Healthy Zhejiang One Million People Cohort K-20230085National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82404341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer (GC) is a major public health challenge in China, highlighting the need for effective risk stratification to improve early detection. This study aimed to validate existing GC risk assessment models and develop a locally adapted screening approach for GC and precancerous lesions.

methodsFrom 2022 to 2024, a total of 144,329 participants were recruited through a large multicenter endoscopic screening cohort in Zhejiang Province, China, with baseline data collected via interviews and endoscopic examinations. Participants screened in 2022 were used for model development, whereas those screened during 2023-2024 were used for validation and comparative analyses. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and logistic regression were used to construct a new model and a weighted point-based risk score. Six previously published models were externally validated for comparison across the validation set. Model performance and clinical utility were assessed and compared using area under the curve (AUC), detection rates, and decision curve analysis for both GC and the composite outcome of GC/high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN).

resultsA total of 1,419 GC cases were identified in the screening cohort. The newly developed model demonstrated favorable discriminative performance, with an AUC of 0.759 (95% CI: 0.744-0.775) for GC and 0.754 (95% CI: 0.740-0.768) for the composite outcome of GC/HGIN in the validation set. External evaluation of six previously published models showed AUCs ranging from 0.594 (95% CI: 0.558-0.629) to 0.742 (95% CI: 0.725-0.758) for GC, and from 0.602 (95% CI: 0.570-0.635) to 0.744 (95% CI: 0.730-0.759) for GC/HGIN. Risk stratification analyses demonstrated progressively increasing odds of both GC and GC/HGIN across higher-risk quartiles in most evaluated models. In the newly developed model, the highest-risk quartile accounted for 62.25% of GC cases and 58.56% of HGIN cases, indicating substantial enrichment of clinically significant lesions. Decision curve analysis indicated a favorable net benefit of the newly developed model across the evaluated range of threshold probabilities.

conclusionsThe newly developed model demonstrated favorable discrimination, stable geographic performance, and effective risk stratification in a large multicenter screening cohort. These findings support its potential utility for risk-adapted GC screening in Chinese populations.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerStomach NeoplasmsAgedChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentCancer preventionCancer screeningGastric cancerModel constructionRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42902381
PMCPMC13685247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.