ArticleBMC health services research2026
Facilitators and barriers to health promotion interventions in the National Defence Forces of Ethiopia: a grounded theory study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Ethiopian military implements health promotion interventions to improve and maintain fitness, health, and military readiness. However, distinct organizational features of military forces can affect the health of their members. This study aimed to explore facilitators and barriers to implementing health promotion interventions within Ethiopian military settings and develop a conceptual model based on the findings.
methodsA grounded theory approach was used in this qualitative study. We identified 26 participants among health experts engaged in health promotion and disease prevention interventions in Ethiopian military health facilities and health departments. Data were collected using face-to-face interviews with key open questions, which were recorded, transcribed verbatim in Amharic, and translated into English. The English transcripts were analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding with a constant comparative method, leading to the identification of a core category and the development of a conceptual model. ATLAS.ti was used to manage and code the data.
resultsThis study involved 26 experts (21 males and 5 females) working on health promotion interventions in a military context. Five key categories emerged as facilitators: organizational, structural, professional, collaborative, and military factors. Barriers were grouped into three categories: organizational, professional, and military factors. Key facilitators included information sharing, the proximity of health personnel at lower levels, sharing best experiences, trainings, working with a shared understanding and with partners, the chain of command, living in mass, and being young. Major barriers included resource constraints, staff turnover, the demanding nature of military work, living in mass, deployment in desert environments, and peer influence. The successful implementation of health promotion interventions in military settings is influenced by the dynamic interaction of organizational, structural, professional, collaborative, and military factors.
conclusionsThis study identified key facilitators and barriers to health promotion interventions in the military context. The chain of command and the presence of health personnel at lower levels emerged as key facilitators, while resource constraints were important barriers. These findings, along with the conceptual model developed, provide valuable guidance for policymakers and practitioners involved in health promotion efforts within the Ethiopian military context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.