Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902363›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026

Ensuring equitable emergency, critical and operative care.

Tim Baker, Carl Otto Schell, Pauline Convocar, Fitsum Kifle, Niranjan Kissoon, Nobhojit Roy, Karima Khalid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tim BakerDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. tim.baker@ki.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8727-7018
Carl Otto SchellDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pauline ConvocarInternational Federation of Emergency Medicine, Manila, Philippines.
Fitsum KifleDebre Berhan University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Niranjan KissoonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Nobhojit RoyGeorge Institute for Global Health, Mumbai, India.
Karima KhalidMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conditions requiring emergency, critical and operative (ECO) care account for a substantial proportion of preventable mortality and disability worldwide, yet ECO systems remain fragmented and underdeveloped in many settings. Recent global policy advances, including the adoption of the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Strategy and Action Plan for Integrated ECO Care by the World Health Assembly, provide an important opportunity to strengthen these systems. However, implementation must prioritise equity. ECO care spans a wide spectrum of complexity and cost, from basic triage, oxygen therapy and essential operations to advanced intensive care and specialised surgery. Given finite resources, health systems should first ensure universal access to foundational ECO care: early recognition of illness, basic airway and oxygen support, essential medications, monitoring, infection prevention, and timely referral. Approaches such as Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC) offer a feasible, highly cost-effective minimum standard of care, and prioritising such foundational ECO care is both an ethical imperative and the most effective pathway to achieving equitable population-level health gains.

Indexed as

Critical CareEmergency Medical ServicesHealth EquityGlobal HealthHumansWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID42902363
PMCPMC13685155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.