ReviewNeurological research and practice2026
Stroke-associated pneumonia: from immunodepression to bedside management and future research directions.
Review in Neurological research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) is one of the most frequent complications after acute stroke, affecting approximately one in eight stroke patients. Besides prolonged hospitalisation and increased healthcare costs, it is also a major risk factor for mortality and poor functional recovery. The pathophysiology of SAP is driven by two converging processes: impaired local airway defence due to dysphagia as well as reduced airway clearance reflexes, and systemic stroke-induced immunodepression driven by dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system. While post-stroke immunodepression is a major risk factor for SAP, it might limit unwanted autoimmune responses within the brain. Conversely, SAP itself may drive neuroinflammation and contribute to post-stroke cognitive impairment. Despite its clinical importance, high-quality evidence to guide practice on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of SAP remains scarce and guideline recommendations are mostly based on expert consensus. Diagnosis of SAP is suggested to be based on standardised clinical criteria supported by chest radiography and C-reactive protein as an adjunct where uncertainty persists. After diagnosis, guidelines suggest prompt empirical antibiotic therapy according to local protocols. In contrast, preventive antibiotics, even for high-risk patients, neither improve clinical outcome nor reduce SAP frequency. Currently recommended preventive strategies for SAP therefore mostly focus on dysphagia management and early mobilisation. This review integrates the pathophysiology, long-term consequences of SAP and further research directions based on the current knowledge on post-stroke immunology with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of SAP as set out in the recent European Stroke Organisation guideline and related guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.