ArticleBMC medical education2026
A study of gender-specific differences in online platform in medical education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study explores gender-specific learning patterns among medical students using a national online educational platform in France. Although the proportion of women admitted to medical schools has steadily increased, persistent gender disparities remain in medical career progression. These inequalities may already emerge during university training, influencing learning behaviors. Understanding when and how these differences appear is crucial to designing targeted interventions that promote equity in medical education.
methodsWe analyzed anonymized data from all sixth-year medical students in France during the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 academic years. This dataset covers the entire national cohort using the online platform to prepare for mandatory medical examinations. We applied a Subgroup Discovery algorithm using gender as the target variable to identify interpretable patterns associated with online engagement, learning activity and academic performance that characterize male and female students. Analyses considered platform use, participation in interactive activities, and performance across assessment formats and medical specialties.
resultsOur analysis revealed marked gender differences in both engagement and academic performance. Male students were more likely to belong to subgroups characterized by high engagement with the platform or higher academic performance, particularly in Progressive Case assessments and several medical specialties. Female students were more frequently associated with lower participation in the platform's interactive features and with response patterns suggesting a greater tendency to omit correct answer choices. Together with the existing literature, these findings generated several hypotheses regarding the mechanisms underlying these disparities, including assessment design, response strategies under uncertainty, examination context, and psychological factors.
conclusionsGender disparities in performance are already observable during medical training, before students enter professional practice. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating how assessment design, online learning environments, and educational support influence gender equity in medical education. This study also illustrates the value of data-driven approaches such as Subgroup Discovery for generating testable hypotheses that can inform future educational research and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.