ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2026
Cancer metastasis: biological mechanisms, therapeutic bottlenecks, and emerging interventions.
Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic cancer remains a major clinical challenge, which is driven by the continuous adaptation of disseminated tumor cells to diverse tissue environments and therapeutic pressures. Although current treatments, including conventional therapies, small-molecule drugs, antibody-drug conjugates, and immunotherapies, have improved clinical outcomes in selected patients, they rarely achieve durable disease control, largely because each stage of the metastatic cascade presents distinct therapeutic bottlenecks. This review examines these bottlenecks and identifies therapeutic vulnerabilities that can be targeted at each metastatic stage. Cross-stage adaptive programs, encompassing genetic, epigenetic, metabolic, immune, and microenvironmental alterations, are linked to the specific modes of therapeutic failure they drive, thereby connecting underlying mechanisms with their corresponding clinical consequences. Emerging therapeutic strategies are discussed in the context of the metastatic stage, and general design principles for combination regimens are proposed. We also highlight the potential of liquid biopsy-guided dynamic treatment adjustment and advanced preclinical models to inform patient selection, treatment timing, and the design of therapies aimed at overcoming resistance. By integrating metastatic biology, mechanisms of therapeutic failure, and emerging interventions, this review provides a framework for understanding and targeting the bottlenecks that limit durable disease control in metastatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.