SynthesisBMC pediatrics2026
Prenatal statin exposure and adverse birth outcomes in Asian women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe safety of statin use during pregnancy remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the association between prenatal statin exposure and pregnancy outcomes in Asian women, including low birth weight, preterm birth, and congenital anomalies.
methodsWe conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in Asian populations evaluating prenatal statin exposure. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and trial registries were searched through January 31, 2026. Eligible randomized and observational studies included Asian populations and reported low birth weight, preterm birth, or congenital anomalies. Adjusted risk ratios were pooled using random-effects inverse-variance models, and risk of bias was assessed with standard tools.
resultsThree nationwide observational cohort studies from Taiwan and South Korea were included in the quantitative synthesis, and one Indonesian randomized trial of pravastatin for preeclampsia prevention was reviewed qualitatively. Prenatal statin exposure was not associated with congenital anomalies (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89-1.08; I
conclusionsThe available Asian evidence, largely derived from nationwide East Asian cohorts, suggests no clear association between prenatal statin exposure or continuation and congenital anomalies. A modest association with low birth weight was observed, whereas evidence for preterm birth remained inconclusive. The low-birth-weight finding should be interpreted cautiously because of residual confounding, comparator heterogeneity, prematurity-related low birth weight, and pharmacological heterogeneity across statins. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251235975.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.