ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Cardiovascular disease prediction and mortality risk assessment using a QSAO‑optimized BP neural network.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, imposing a substantial burden on global healthcare systems. Early detection and accurate mortality risk assessment are critical for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes. However, existing predictive models often suffer from limited clinical applicability due to their restriction to single diagnostic tasks, insufficient prediction accuracy, and a tendency toward overfitting.
methodsThis study proposes a novel hybrid intelligent model, termed QSAO-BP, which integrates a quartile based Snow Ablation Optimizer (QSAO) with a Back Propagation (BP) neural network for simultaneous cardiovascular disease (CVD) diagnosis and mortality risk assessment. The QSAO enhances the SAO by incorporating Gaussian and Lévy random walks through a quartile based strategy, effectively mitigating premature convergence and local optima entrapment of SAO. The QSAO optimizes the hyperparameters of the BP neural network to improve its predictive accuracy and generalization capability. A dual validation framework is established using the Cleveland Heart Disease Dataset and the Heart Failure Clinical Records Dataset. Extensive experiments compare QSAO-BP against nine optimizer based BP variants and four classical machine learning algorithms across ten evaluation metrics.
resultsQSAO-BP achieves superior performance on both datasets, attaining an accuracy of 0.873 on Dataset 1 and 0.854 on Dataset 2, representing improvements of 8.178% and 9.347% over SAO-BP, respectively. The model also achieves the highest accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and MCC while maintaining competitive specificity and NPV. SHAP analysis reveals that the key predictors identified by QSAO-BP are consistent with established clinical knowledge.
conclusionsQSAO-BP delivers robust and accurate predictions across two distinct clinical tasks with satisfactory interpretability, positioning it as a promising tool to support clinical decision making in CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.