ArticleBMC medical education2026
Large-group virtual anatomy via a smart digital podium: a preliminary cross-sectional study of student perspectives toward remote anatomage teaching in a medical lecture hall.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Anatomage virtual dissection table is conventionally deployed in small groups in the dissection laboratory, limiting simultaneous access to one cohort at a time. Remote streaming of the live Anatomage interface over an institutional local area network (LAN) to a smart digital podium in a large lecture theatre-termed Remote Anatomage Teaching (RAT)-represents an unexplored model for scaling virtual anatomy instruction to an entire medical cohort simultaneously.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India. A single integrated basal nuclei lecture combining blackboard diagrams, PowerPoint slides, and live remote Anatomage streaming was delivered to 125 first-year MBBS students. A 13-item attitude questionnaire, developed de novo for this study, was completed anonymously by 94 students immediately post-session (response rate: 75.2%, 94/125); internal consistency of nine attitudinal preference items (the seven comparative items [Items 3, 4, 6-10], Interest in Anatomy [Item 11], and Curriculum Integration [Item 12], excluding Realism [Item 5]), used as a descriptive baseline reliability estimate, was Cronbach's α = 0.873.
resultsThe RAT session was delivered without technical interruption throughout the 47-minute lecture. Among 94 respondents, 76.6% (72/94) rated RAT as more engaging or much more engaging than regular theory classes. RAT was preferred over PowerPoint-based lectures across all nine comparative pedagogical domains, with preferences ranging from 55.3% (self-paced learning) to 84.0% (curriculum integration). Realism compared to cadaveric dissection was endorsed by 81.9% (77/94). Three qualitative themes emerged from reflexive thematic analysis of 30 substantive free-text responses: visual engagement and retention, preference for blended delivery, and projection visibility as a technical constraint.
conclusionsLarge-group RAT via a smart digital podium is technically feasible and elicits strongly favorable student perspectives across multiple pedagogical domains. This scalable model extends virtual anatomy technology to large lecture hall settings without additional hardware investment. A powered randomized controlled trial incorporating an active comparator arm is warranted as the definitive next step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.