Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902181›Full record

ReviewBMC infectious diseases2026

A survey of explainable AI applications in infectious disease diagnosis.

Hossein Valishirin, Fatemeh Inanloo S A, Kelly A Brayton, Shira L Broschat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hossein ValishirinSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, P.O. Box 642752, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Fatemeh Inanloo S ASchool of Computer Science, Amirkabir University of Technology, 350 Hafez Ave, Tehran, 1591634311, Iran.
Kelly A BraytonDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, 100 Dairy Rd, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Shira L BroschatSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, P.O. Box 642752, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. shira@wsu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9894-7371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, has shown significant promise in accelerating the diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, the inherent "black box" nature of deep learning is a major barrier to clinical adoption, preventing trust and accountability. Explainable AI (XAI) tries to address this problem by adding transparency to model decision-making. This paper presents a comprehensive scoping review of XAI applications in infectious disease diagnosis based on literature published between 2023 and 2025. We review studies of major diseases, including COVID-19, tuberculosis, malaria, monkeypox, and dengue, categorizing them by data modality (e.g., imaging, tabular) and the XAI techniques employed (e.g., SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM). We conclude that XAI methods are effective in identifying clinically relevant features, such as key biomarkers from lab results and pathological regions in medical images, thereby aligning model reasoning with established clinical knowledge. Despite this progress, significant challenges persist, including poor generalizability from small, single-center datasets, the computational overhead of post-hoc methods, and a gap between technical explanations and clinical utility. We outline future directions that should be taken, including the need for standardized evaluation metrics, multi-center validation, and clinician-centered XAI design to facilitate the responsible integration of AI into clinical practice.Clinical trial numberNot applicable.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCommunicable DiseasesDeep LearningHumansDiagnosticsExplainable AIInfectious diseasesInterpretabilityMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID42902181
PMCPMC13685100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.