ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Refractory rapidly progressive diffuse in-stent restenosis with left main involvement: a case report.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrug-eluting stents (DES) have significantly reduced the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, a subset of patients still develop refractory, rapidly progressive, and diffuse ISR, which poses substantial therapeutic challenges and reflects its complex underlying mechanisms. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 46-year-old male who underwent five percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) over five years, with repeated diffuse ISR in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Initial PCI was followed by DCB therapy after first ISR, achieving temporary symptom relief. Four years later, ISR progressed to chronic total occlusion, requiring further stenting and DCB therapy. Within five months, he developed 99% LM stenosis and recurrent LAD ISR. Despite a SYNTAX score of 36 favoring CABG, the patient refused surgery. Under intra-aortic balloon pump support, a balloon-only PCI (stent-less) strategy was performed. IVUS revealed diffuse fibrous proliferation and neoatherosclerosis. During follow-up, the patient remained clinically stable overall.
conclusionThis case highlights a potential systemic hyperproliferative phenotype, in which repeated vascular injury triggers accelerated neoatherosclerosis and intimal hyperplasia. It challenges the conventional view of ISR as a local mechanical problem and underscores the importance of mechanism-driven risk stratification and individualized management, particularly when standard surgical therapy is declined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.