Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902124›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

Comparison of Labeled Dosages Between Japan and the United States for Drugs Approved in Japan from 2020 to 2025.

Takashi Funatogawa, Akihiro Yoshida

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takashi FunatogawaChugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 1-1 Nihonbashi-Muromachi 2-Chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-8324, Japan. funatogawatks@chugai-pharm.co.jp.
Akihiro YoshidaChugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 1-1 Nihonbashi-Muromachi 2-Chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-8324, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough approved doses in Japan have generally been lower than in Western countries, these differences have been diminished with global drug development. Studies evaluating dose differences between Japan and the United States (US) using post-2010 data are limited, and none have focused on the 2020s.

methodsThis study characterized labeled dosage differences between Japan and the US for new molecular entities approved during 2020-2025. Major differences were defined as a ≥2-fold difference in the maintenance or maximum dose; all others were classified as minor differences.

resultsOf 187 comparable drugs, 38 (20.3%) had dosage differences between Japan and the US: seven drugs (3.7%) showed major differences (three with higher doses in Japan and four with higher doses in the US), and 31 drugs (16.6%) showed minor differences. Common minor differences included initial-dose differences and body weight-based subgroup differences. Nervous system drugs showed the highest proportion of dosage differences (50.0%), followed by alimentary tract and metabolism (31.3%) and cardiovascular system drugs (22.2%). In contrast, dermatological (11.1%), antineoplastic (10.7%), and systemic anti-infective drugs (8.3%) showed lower proportions. No large differences were observed across assessed factors such as dosing types (fixed dose, per body weight) and administration routes.

conclusionsApproximately 20% of drugs approved in Japan during 2020-2025 had dosage differences from those in the US. The proportion of drugs with dosage differences varied across therapeutic areas. Only 3.7% had major differences. These findings may reflect progress in the international harmonization of labeled drug dosages between Japan and the US.

Indexed as

DosageInternationalJapanLabelingRegulatory decisions

Identifiers

PMID42902124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.