SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2026
Evidence for Embedding Smoking and Vaping Cessation Support in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.
Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmoking is a leading preventable cause of disease, with vaping creating new public health concerns. This review synthesised evidence on interventions and strategies to integrate cessation care into primary healthcare.
methodsWe conducted a systematic scoping review of PubMed and EMBASE for studies published between 19 September 2020 and 19 September 2024. Eligible studies evaluated smoking and/or vaping cessation interventions or implementation strategies in primary care settings in high-income countries (Australia, Canada, EU, UK, USA). Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, intervention types, outcomes, and abstinence verification.
resultsOf 2166 records screened, 30 empirical studies were included. Most focused on smoking cessation, with only two addressing e-cigarette users. The strongest evidence supported multi-component interventions combining behavioural counselling and pharmacological treatments. Implementation strategies included electronic health record prompts, cost-free pharmacotherapy, financial incentives, and integration of cessation support into low-dose computed tomography screening or post-spirometry feedback. Evidence for the effectiveness of provider education was inconclusive.
conclusionsThe evidence supports several interventions and implementation strategies for integrating smoking cessation into primary care, though data on vaping cessation are limited. These findings will inform the development of targeted approaches to enhance cessation support in primary healthcare.
Identifiers
42902121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.