Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902111›Full record

ArticleDiscover mental health2026

Suicide among children and adolescents in India as a public mental health priority.

Thangaduraipandi Ramakrishnan, Alexandra A Deac, Shankavi Vivekanandhan, Tatiana Taylor Salisbury, Dhanasekara Pandian Ramasamy, Anish V Cherian, Rajendra Kiragasur Madegowda, Nanda Kishore Kannuri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thangaduraipandi RamakrishnanDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560029, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1313-0982
Alexandra A DeacInstitute for Connected Communities, University of East London, London, UK. a.deac@uel.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7048-5670
Shankavi VivekanandhanDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560029, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3589-8626
Tatiana Taylor SalisburyCentre for Global Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-3886
Dhanasekara Pandian RamasamyDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560029, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1838-3291
Anish V CherianDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560029, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-9644
Rajendra Kiragasur MadegowdaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4990-6028
Nanda Kishore KannuriDepartment of Anthropology, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500046, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2352-6972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide among children and adolescents (≤ 18 years old) is a growing public health concern in India, contributing to an alarming 6% of total suicides reported in 2022. Despite policy efforts, systemic gaps in prevention, reporting, and mental health infrastructure persist. METHODS/APPROACH: This paper uses secondary data from the Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India (ADSI) reports (2014-2023) published by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) to map the key trends and key drivers of suicide among youth in India. Descriptive report estimates on suicide data among individuals aged 0-18 years were categorised by gender, cause, and year. To interpret the underlying drivers of suicide, we applied the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM), which organises risk factors across four levels: individual, interpersonal, community, and societal.

resultsBetween 2014 and 2023, a total of 100,787 children died by suicide in India, with female children consistently outnumbering males. The most frequently reported causes were family-related problems (25,049), followed by academic failure (12,988), love affairs (12,988), and mental illness (6143). Nearly 29% of suicides were attributed to unknown or "other" causes, indicating gaps in documentation.

conclusionSuicide among Indian children and adolescents is driven by multifaceted structural and psychosocial factors. A Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological approach reveals multiple points of intervention, including school-based mental health services, family support programs, anti-stigma initiatives, and community-level capacity building. A coordinated public health response tailored to each SEM level is essential to reverse current trends and safeguard child mental health.

Indexed as

Children and adolescentsInterventionsMental healthPsychosocial issuesSuicide

Identifiers

PMID42902111
PMCPMC13683269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.