ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2026
Fused filament fabrication of radiopaque barium sulfate-reinforced polyetheretherketone composites for thin-walled patient-specific orbital reconstruction.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF) of high-performance thermoplastic composites for medical applications remains challenging due to the need to meet geometric precision, mechanical, and functional requirements. This study presents the first systematic evaluation of FFF radiopaque barium sulfate-reinforced polyetheretherketone (BaSO₄-PEEK) for patient-specific orbital reconstruction, addressing dimensional accuracy, mechanical properties, and surgical precision in thin-walled implants. Six implants per material group (unfilled PEEK and 20 wt% BaSO₄-PEEK) with 0.8 mm nominal wall thickness and complex orbital geometries were fabricated and evaluated. Optical scanning showed submillimeter-level dimensional accuracy, with root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.31 ± 0.09 mm for unfilled PEEK and 0.33 ± 0.08 mm for BaSO₄-PEEK, confirming that incorporating an organic filler does not compromise manufacturability. Biomechanical testing revealed that FFF BaSO₄-PEEK implants maintained adequate puncture strength (17.58 ± 0.46 N/mm²), comparable to titanium mesh. Radiographically, BaSO₄-PEEK implants provided a 38% higher contrast-to-noise ratio than titanium and eliminated metal artefacts that obscured adjacent soft tissues. Cadaveric implantation demonstrated reconstruction accuracy (RMSE) of 0.61 ± 0.15 mm, which was better than that of manually contoured titanium mesh. These results establish FFF as a viable manufacturing method for complex, thin-walled, radiopaque PEEK composite orbital implants that provide sufficient dimensional control and mechanical performance in clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.