Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Patient characteristics and the safety of stent placement for malignant vena cava syndrome in Japan: a nationwide analysis.
Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the overall safety of stent placement for malignant superior or inferior vena cava (SVC/IVC) syndrome by assessing adverse events in a nationwide multicenter population.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination nationwide inpatient database. Patients who underwent stent placement for malignant superior or inferior vena cava (SVC/IVC) syndrome between April 2019 and March 2023 were included. The primary endpoint was the overall incidence of adverse events, which were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Secondary evaluations included patient characteristics, underlying malignancies, therapeutic interventions, 7-day mortality after stent placement, 30-day in-hospital mortality after admission, and comparisons between the SVC and IVC groups.
resultsThis nationwide study included 301 patients from 137 hospitals, of whom 187 underwent SVC stenting, and 114 underwent IVC stenting. Overall, 34 adverse events occurred in 32 patients (10.6%). Red blood cell transfusion was required in 10 patients (3.3%), but no invasive treatment, including embolization, was required. Seven-day mortality after stenting was 5.0%, and 30-day in-hospital mortality after admission was 11.6%. In comparisons between the SVC and IVC groups, respiratory failure was more common after SVC stenting, whereas other adverse events and mortality were comparable between groups. Lung tumors predominated in SVC cases and liver tumors in IVC cases; multiple stents were used more frequently in IVC cases.
conclusionStent placement for malignant vena cava obstruction demonstrated an overall complication rate of 10.6% with no serious adverse events requiring invasive intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42902092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.