ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2026
Embedded Autism Evaluations in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: Perspectives on Provider and Caregiver Experiences, Implementation, and Sustainment.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Autism in Primary Care Program (APC) was developed to train embedded psychologists in urban community primary care settings to provide autism diagnostic evaluations and to engage care coordinators in supporting families navigating autism services. The objective of this study was to understand provider and caregiver experiences and clarify implementation and sustainment factors of APC. Primary care providers (PCPs) and caregivers shared their experiences of APC services through interviews and focus groups. Grounded in the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) implementation science framework, feedback on implementation and sustainment factors of the program was collected from the implementation team (embedded psychologists and care coordinators) through periodic reflection procedures. Caregivers and PCPs reported positive experiences with APC including evaluation timeliness, care coordination support, and the program's integration within primary care. They also described ongoing supports families needed following the evaluation. The implementation team identified factors impacting the implementation and sustainment of the program, many of which aligned with qualitative findings from caregivers and PCPs. Identifying multiple perspectives on APC can inform our field on a promising model which can improve earlier diagnosis and treatment access for families and reduce inequities in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42902076What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.