Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902060›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2026

Cost-effectiveness of prehospital high-sensitivity troponin i testing versus standard emergency department care in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in France.

Franck Maunoury, Raphaël Couvreur, Pierre Hausfater, Jérémy Guénézan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04950244 (Diagnostic Evaluation of Out-of-hospital High-sensitivity Troponin I in Patients Presenting Chest Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04950244 completednot on this map

Diagnostic Evaluation of Out-of-hospital High-sensitivity Troponin I in Patients Presenting Chest Pain

TypeobservationalSponsorPoitiers University HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled800ConditionsChest PainArmsHigh-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Franck MaunourySTATESIA, Le Mans, France. franck.maunoury@univ-lemans.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1045-4666
Raphaël CouvreurEmergency Department and Pre-Hospital Care, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Pierre HausfaterPoint of Care in Emergency Room (POCER) Network, ANR-24-DIME-0003, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux France, Biochemistry Laboratory - Hormone Testing, University Hospital of Nice, University of Nice Côte d'Azur, Pasteur 1, Nice, F-06000, France.
Jérémy GuénézanEmergency Department and Pre-Hospital Care, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4736-1490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrehospital point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) may support earlier triage of adults with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We assessed its short-term economic consequences compared with standard emergency department (ED)-based care in France.

methodsWe developed a decision-analytic, continuous-time semi-Markov model over a 24-hour horizon using individual patient data from the prospective, multicentre, double-blinded cohort study (VALIDATE) conducted across four French hospitals (July 2021-May 2024; n = 737). The reference analysis adopted a restricted prehospital-and-ED perspective covering measured medical and paramedical resources from first emergency medical service contact through ED disposition (states 1-3). A complementary database audit searched for patients recorded with less than 24 h of follow-up in an extended "prehospital, emergency department and hospital" setting. None were identified; inpatient, intensive care unit (ICU), coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) costs were therefore excluded from the reference-case totals. The initial hs-cTnI H0 sample was obtained before hospital arrival, whereas subsequent H1 or H3 samples, when required, were intended to be collected after arrival. Costs were reported in 2025 euros. Sampling uncertainty was assessed using 1,000 non-parametric bootstrap replications and scenario analyses examined clinically relevant subgroups (> 3 h since symptom onset; availability of a prehospital HEART score).

resultsAmong 737 participants (mean age 65.4 years; 58.8% men), 77 (10.4%) had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. ED attendance was lower with hs-cTnI than with standard care (90.9% [95% CI 88.6-92.8] vs. 96.7% [95% CI 95.2-97.8]; absolute difference - 5.8% points [95% CI - 9.2 to - 2.4]; P < 0.001). Among ED attendees, mean ED length of stay was 1.63 h versus 2.76 h (P < 0.001). Mean prehospital-and-ED cost per patient was €185.24 with hs-cTnI and €268.55 with standard care, a saving of €83.31 ([95% CI 70.81-96.60]; P < 0.001).

conclusionsWithin the restricted 24-hour prehospital-and-ED perspective supported by the available patient-level data, a strategy beginning with prehospital hs-cTnI testing was associated with fewer ED attendances, shorter ED stays and lower costs. Longer-term evaluations are planned because these findings do not establish system-wide for inpatient, wider organisational, patient and societal costs.

trial registrationThe VALIDATE study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04950244).

Indexed as

Acute coronary syndromeChest painCost-effectivenessHigh-sensitivity troponinPrehospital care

Identifiers

PMID42902060
PMCPMC13685092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.