Observational studyArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Clinical outcomes and feasibility of a fast-track protocol after total ankle replacement: a prospective study.
Observational study in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostoperative recovery after total ankle replacement remains challenging, and evidence supporting the use of fast-track protocols in this setting is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes and safety of a fast-track protocol following total ankle replacement.
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted on consecutive adult patients undergoing primary total ankle replacement through an anterior approach between January 2023 and June 2024. All procedures were performed by a single experienced surgeon using the same implant. The fast-track protocol included early postoperative mobilization, multimodal pain management, bleeding control, and structured physiotherapy with standardized discharge criteria. Ankle function was assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society's (AOFAS) Ankle Hindfoot Scale preoperatively and at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to active ankle mobilization, time to assisted ambulation with crutches, length of hospital stay, and wound healing evaluated using the ASEPSIS wound score.
resultsTwenty-two patients were included. Median AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Scale scores improved significantly from 29.0 preoperatively to 68.0 at discharge. Active ankle mobilization was achieved after a median of two days, assisted ambulation after three days, and the median hospital stay was five days. Wound healing outcomes were favourable, with low ASEPSIS scores and only one minor wound complication managed conservatively. No major wound complications, infections, or prosthesis-related adverse events were observed.
conclusionIn this prospective single-arm study, a fast-track protocol following total ankle replacement was feasible and was associated with early functional recovery and favourable short-term safety outcomes. These findings should be interpreted as preliminary and descriptive, given the absence of a control group. Larger comparative studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine its effectiveness relative to conventional postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.