ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Operational Ontology for Radiology: A Framework for Profiling and Characterizing CT Imaging Data.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical imaging data are increasingly used for benchmarking, quality improvement, research, and artificial intelligence applications. However, the lack of consistent metadata characterization limits the reliability and scalability of such analyses. Existing standards provide syntactic interoperability but often fail to capture the semantic clinical context and workflow details necessary for secondary uses such as AI development and radiation safety assessment, affecting the utility for reproducible profiling of imaging examinations across institutions. In this work, we describe key gaps in current approaches to imaging data standardization. These include syntactic interoperability without semantic equivalence, limited representation of clinically relevant context, inconsistent definitions of radiology procedures across institutions, and the absence of mechanisms to systematically profile imaging examinations for analysis. These limitations make it difficult to compare imaging practices, aggregate datasets, and interpret results across sites. To address these challenges, we have devised an ontology framework, the Operational Ontology for Radiology (OOR), that models the radiology study workflow from ordering through interpretation using explicitly defined entities, relationships, and annotated data properties. A CT-focused implementation of the framework was then formed, including 34 classes, 15 object properties, and 156 data properties in this present formation. The framework was deployed in a demonstrative use case scenario to illustrate the utility of OOR in drawing more clinically relevant radiation dose aggregates from clinical CT data. The work demonstrates that OOR provides both a structured representation of imaging data and a foundation for more transparent data aggregation, scalable secondary analysis, and reproducible characterization of imaging practices across institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42902039What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.