ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
A Web-Based Registry Framework Linking Transfusion Practice to Long-Term Patient Outcomes: Design and Single-Center Feasibility Study.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood transfusions are among the most common medical interventions performed worldwide. Several comprehensive databases link transfusions to routinely collected health data but do not include the indication and the decision-making basis for a particular administration, nor patient-reported long-term outcomes. We developed a web-based registry for the standardized assessment of transfusion practice and patient outcomes, designed for an observation period of up to 30 years. The framework combines clinical data captured at the point of care with patient-reported outcome measures collected through automated digital follow-up, ensures privacy by design through physical separation of identifying and medical data, and codes diagnoses and procedures in SNOMED CT. We evaluated feasibility in a single-center pilot at Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt (11 September 2024-15 January 2026), with patient-reported follow-up collected through 13 August 2026. A total of 408 patients were enrolled, yielding 1,298 administrations across nine treatment categories in a predominantly cardiac surgical cohort. The pilot demonstrated that the registry integrates into routine clinical workflows, captures the parameters required for guideline-adherence monitoring, and supports sex-disaggregated, descriptive analyses of transfusion practice. Follow-up was completed by 12.5% of patients at 3 months and 15.2% of patients at 1 year; paired baseline-follow-up assessments of physical capacity and frailty demonstrate the data structure for capturing functional recovery. Risk-adjusted benchmarking, network-wide analyses, and donor outcomes are designed capabilities of the framework that were not evaluated in this pilot. The platform is available in 16 languages and participation is open to further institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.