Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902026›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Perceptions of ostrich welfare and ethical practices: insights from consumers, farmers and stakeholders.

Maud Bonato, Monique Dawson, Anel Engelbrecht, Schalk W P Cloete

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maud BonatoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou, 0950, South Africa. maud.bonato@univen.ac.za.
Monique DawsonDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
Anel EngelbrechtDirectorate Animal Sciences, Western Cape Department of Agriculture, Oudtshoorn, 6620, South Africa.
Schalk W P CloeteDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated South African consumers', farmers', and industry stakeholders' perceptions of ostrich welfare using a questionnaire distributed nationwide between September 2018 and September 2019. The survey included demographic questions and assessed knowledge of ostrich husbandry, welfare priorities, and purchasing behaviors. A total of 302 participants completed the questionnaire. A Principal Component Analysis identified three principal components that explained 49.5% of the total variance: ostrich welfare priorities, knowledge of ostrich production and management, and health and ethical considerations in ostrich farming. Welfare priorities and knowledge levels were influenced by demographic factors, with farmers consistently scoring the highest on knowledge and consumers the lowest. All participants reported a modest understanding of husbandry practices but placed a high importance on welfare-related factors such as feeding, housing, health, and minimizing pain and stress. Although most participants preferred welfare-conscious products, their willingness to pay a premium was low. These findings highlight a strong welfare orientation across groups but reveal knowledge gaps and an attitude-behavior gap, suggesting opportunities for targeted education, improved industry awareness and transparency, and welfare-focused product communication.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal WelfareFarmersStruthioniformesAdultAnimalsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesAnimal husbandryEthical standardsPerception differencesStruthio camelusSurvey

Identifiers

PMID42902026
PMCPMC13683527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.