ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2026
Lineage plasticity-driven immunometabolic state transitions in advanced prostate cancer: biomarkers and therapeutic stratification.
Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advanced prostate cancer is commonly described as immunologically cold, yet that label obscures a disease continually remodelled by treatment. Androgen-receptor (AR) pathway inhibition, chemotherapy, DNA-damage-directed therapy and radioligand treatment select resistant clones while altering lineage identity, metabolic dependence, antigen presentation and metastatic niches. AR-high, AR-low, double-negative, amphicrine and treatment-emergent neuroendocrine phenotypes are therefore better viewed as evolving immunometabolic states than as fixed histologies. Here, we develop a lineage-metabolism-immunity framework that integrates metastatic biopsies, longitudinal sampling, single-cell and spatial analyses, functional imaging and mechanistic prostate cancer models. Lineage determines which metabolic programmes remain available; tumour, stromal and immune cells then compete for nutrients and exchange metabolites that shape antigen presentation, myeloid suppression and lymphocyte function. We focus on glucose and lactate, lipids, amino acids, hypoxia-adenosine signalling and epigenetically active metabolites, while separating patient evidence from causal prostate cancer models and pan-cancer inference. The framework reframes three clinical tasks: identifying the state driving progression, recognising transitions under therapy and selecting combinations that relieve the dominant immune bottleneck without disabling effector cells. Translation will require longitudinal, lesion-aware measurements that connect lineage markers to functional evidence of metabolic dependence and immune context. The goal is not a universal metabolic target, but a tractable intervention matched to the tumour state, metastatic site and therapeutic window.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42902014What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.