Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42901956›Full record

ReviewCommunications psychology2026

Effect sizes for brain-based predictive models of cognition across the lifespan.

E Christensen, L Wiersch, M Wang, B McPherson, H Shearer, S Noble, K Lam, J B Poline, E Dhamala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

E ChristensenInstitute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA. erynnchristensen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7260-184X
L WierschInstitute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
M WangORIGAMI Neuro Data Science Laboratory, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3432-6899
B McPhersonORIGAMI Neuro Data Science Laboratory, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
H ShearerNortheastern University BOS, Boston, MA, USA.
S NobleNortheastern University BOS, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4804-5553
K LamInstitute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
J B Poline *ORIGAMI Neuro Data Science Laboratory, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9794-749X
E Dhamala *Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA. elvisha@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8253-6962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-based predictive models offer a promising approach to understanding individual differences in cognitive functioning across the lifespan. This review synthesizes current literature on brain-based cognitive predictions using large-scale datasets, examining how methodological choices and data-related factors impact model performance. We find that brain-based predictive models demonstrate relatively consistent, albeit wide ranging performance across the lifespan, explaining approximately 10-40% of variance in cognitive abilities. Key findings include: (1) models perform better when predicting general cognitive ability compared to specific functions; (2) crystallized abilities are more predictable than fluid abilities; (3) task-based functional connectivity generally outperforms resting-state approaches in younger populations, while structural measures become superior predictors in older adults; (4) multimodal approaches using hierarchical stacked models optimize prediction accuracy; and (5) elastic net and ridge regression provide optimal balance between predictive performance and computational efficiency. In summary, we propose methodological advances to improve the precision and utility of brain-based cognitive predictions.

Identifiers

PMID42901956
PMCPMC13683327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.