ReviewCommunications psychology2026
Effect sizes for brain-based predictive models of cognition across the lifespan.
Review in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-based predictive models offer a promising approach to understanding individual differences in cognitive functioning across the lifespan. This review synthesizes current literature on brain-based cognitive predictions using large-scale datasets, examining how methodological choices and data-related factors impact model performance. We find that brain-based predictive models demonstrate relatively consistent, albeit wide ranging performance across the lifespan, explaining approximately 10-40% of variance in cognitive abilities. Key findings include: (1) models perform better when predicting general cognitive ability compared to specific functions; (2) crystallized abilities are more predictable than fluid abilities; (3) task-based functional connectivity generally outperforms resting-state approaches in younger populations, while structural measures become superior predictors in older adults; (4) multimodal approaches using hierarchical stacked models optimize prediction accuracy; and (5) elastic net and ridge regression provide optimal balance between predictive performance and computational efficiency. In summary, we propose methodological advances to improve the precision and utility of brain-based cognitive predictions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.