Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42901534›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2026

Cuttlefish use the negation of dead prey to judge food value in foraging decision.

Sophie Pei, Jun-Ya Lai, Chuan-Chin Chiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophie PeiKang Chiao International School , New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jun-Ya LaiDepartment of Life Science, National Tsing Hua University , Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chuan-Chin ChiaoDepartment of Life Science, National Tsing Hua University , Hsinchu, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9506-0230

Funding

National Science and Technology Council NSTC-114-2311-B-007-014-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how targeted prey conditions influence foraging decisions is a fundamental issue in animal behaviour. The present study investigated whether cuttlefish use prey liveness to assess overall food quality. Cuttlefish were allowed to choose between different levels of prey freshness and quantity. Experiments 1 and 2 examined cuttlefish choices between one live shrimp alone and one live shrimp paired with either one or four freshly dead shrimps. Experiment 3 evaluated their preferences of one live shrimp paired with either one freshly dead shrimp or one hourly dead shrimp. Experiment 4 assessed their choices between these two types of dead shrimp alone. Results showed that cuttlefish significantly avoided the side containing one live shrimp paired with one freshly dead shrimp, and this avoidance increased proportionally with the quantity of dead shrimp. However, cuttlefish choice did not differ significantly between freshly and hourly dead shrimps. These findings suggest that the presence of dead shrimp decreases a cuttlefish's perceived food value, and that motionless prey, regardless of their condition, serve as a negative indicator of overall food quality. This study demonstrates that cuttlefish assess total prey value based on the negation of dead prey, a mental process of intentionally removing hindrances during evaluation.

Indexed as

DecapodiformesPredatory BehaviorAnimalsChoice BehaviorFeeding BehaviorFood Qualitydecision-makingfood qualityprey freshnessprey liveness

Identifiers

PMID42901534
PMCPMC13682935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.