ArticleBiology letters2026
Cuttlefish use the negation of dead prey to judge food value in foraging decision.
Article in Biology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cuttlefish use the negation of dead prey to judge food value in foraging decision.Biology letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how targeted prey conditions influence foraging decisions is a fundamental issue in animal behaviour. The present study investigated whether cuttlefish use prey liveness to assess overall food quality. Cuttlefish were allowed to choose between different levels of prey freshness and quantity. Experiments 1 and 2 examined cuttlefish choices between one live shrimp alone and one live shrimp paired with either one or four freshly dead shrimps. Experiment 3 evaluated their preferences of one live shrimp paired with either one freshly dead shrimp or one hourly dead shrimp. Experiment 4 assessed their choices between these two types of dead shrimp alone. Results showed that cuttlefish significantly avoided the side containing one live shrimp paired with one freshly dead shrimp, and this avoidance increased proportionally with the quantity of dead shrimp. However, cuttlefish choice did not differ significantly between freshly and hourly dead shrimps. These findings suggest that the presence of dead shrimp decreases a cuttlefish's perceived food value, and that motionless prey, regardless of their condition, serve as a negative indicator of overall food quality. This study demonstrates that cuttlefish assess total prey value based on the negation of dead prey, a mental process of intentionally removing hindrances during evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.