ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2026
The role of genetic distance in modulating intraspecific plant-soil interactions among a diverse assemblage of tropical tree species seedlings.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of genetic distance in modulating intraspecific plant-soil interactions among a diverse assemblage of tropical tree species seedlings.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial specialization on host species can promote plant diversity through plant-soil interactions that affect seedling survival and performance. While these processes are typically studied at the interspecific level, emerging evidence suggests that plant-soil interactions can be genotype-specific, contributing to intraspecific density dependence (iDD). However, iDD remains poorly understood in tropical tree species, particularly with respect to its strength and frequency. We hypothesized that genetic distance among conspecific trees should modulate the strength of iDD, and the direction of the effect-positive or negative seedling response-should reflect the net balance of plant-microbe antagonistic and mutualistic interactions. Using a reciprocal planting experiment across eight tropical tree species, we show that genetic distance between conspecific individuals significantly influences seedling responses, consistent with iDD. Yet, the direction of this effect was variable: Castilla tunu showed higher survival and Wettinia aequalis greater biomass in soils from more genetically distant conspecifics, consistent with negative iDD; Inga marginata exhibited positive iDD; five species exhibited no pattern. These findings demonstrate that genotype-specific plant-soil interactions can generate biologically relevant but variable impacts on seedling responses. This highlights the need to further investigate the drivers and ecological consequences of intraspecific genetic variation in plant-soil interactions and iDD in tropical forests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.