Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42901518›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2026

Contagion and escalation of rule violations.

Lucas Molleman, Karlijn Hoyer, Gerben A van Kleef, Christin Scholz, Jan Hausfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Contagion and escalation of rule violations.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucas MollemanDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7978-7173
Karlijn HoyerDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerben A van KleefDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christin ScholzDepartment of Communication Sciences, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan HausfeldDepartment of Microeconomics, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Dutch Research Council (NWO) 406.21.GO.002Dutch Research Council (NWO) VI.Vidi.231E.050Faculty of Social and Behavioural Science, University of AmsterdamSwedish Research Council 2024-01197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human societies rely on rules to coordinate behaviour, sustain cooperation and maintain social order. Yet compliance can be fragile when rules are weakly enforced and individuals observe others violating them. Prior research shows that rule violations and other antisocial behaviours can spread through social influence, but less is known about how the severity of violations shapes these dynamics. In many real-world settings, rule-breaking occurs in degrees, from minor infractions to major violations, and individuals may not only imitate others but sometimes exceed the violations they observe. Here, we combine simulations and a behavioural experiment (n = 750) to study how the magnitude of observed rule violations shapes subsequent violations, and how this can generate escalation dynamics. Our simulations show that when individuals occasionally escalate beyond observed violations, even rare escalation can trigger a rapid shift from widespread compliance to collective rule-breaking. In our pre-registered experiment, observing major violations strongly increased rule-breaking, especially when committed by socially close others. Observing minor violations prompted many participants to follow suit and a minority to escalate beyond the violations they observed. Parameterizing the simulations with these behavioural responses shows that such escalators can disproportionately undermine collective compliance. These results highlight how asymmetric responses to rule violations and rare escalatory behaviour can transform small deviations into large-scale breakdowns of rule compliance.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorSocial BehaviorHumansgroup dynamicsrule-followingrule violationssocial influencesocial order

Identifiers

PMID42901518
PMCPMC13682926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.