ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
Combined Anterior-Posterior vs. Posterior-Only Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Radiographic, Clinical, and Mechanical Outcomes With Longitudinal Mixed-Effects Analysis.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo compare radiographic, clinical, and mechanical outcomes of posterior-only versus combined anterior-posterior fusion in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion with pelvic fixation.MethodsConsecutive ASD patients undergoing instrumented fusion ≥7 levels with pelvic fixation at a single center (2016-2023) were stratified by surgical approach. Longitudinal radiographic changes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with difference-in-differences (DiD) estimation. Mechanical complications were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards analysis.Results207 patients were included (posterior-only, n=115; combined, n=92). Mean age was 62.1 ± 11.1 years (77.8% female), with mean follow-up of 46.2 ± 21.2 months. The combined approach demonstrated significantly greater DiD estimates for lumbar lordosis (-7.8° to -9.2°, all p<0.001), relative pelvic version mismatch (+3.4° to +4.2°, all p<0.001), and GAP score (-1.8 to -2.1, all p<0.001) at all postoperative timepoints. DiD estimates were stable across three covariate specifications. Rod fractures occurred in 14.8% of posterior-only versus 3.3% of combined patients (p=0.008), with superior rod fracture-free survival in the combined cohort (log-rank p=0.019). In the primary Cox model, the combined approach showed a non-significant trend toward lower rod fracture hazard (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.10-1.24, p=0.10). Patient-reported outcomes improved comparably in both groups.ConclusionsIn long-segment ASD fusion with pelvic fixation, the combined anterior-posterior approach was associated with greater sustained sagittal correction and lower rod fracture rates, while both approaches provided comparable clinical improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.