ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
A Procedural Faculty Development Course for Emergency Physicians Practicing in Community and Academic Settings.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMaintaining competence in high-acuity, low-occurrence (HALO) procedures poses a challenge for emergency physicians as they progress past residency training or practice in lower-acuity settings. Simulation-based deliberate practice offers a feasible method to sustain procedural competence. We developed and evaluated a blended, faculty development procedural curriculum designed to improve confidence and clinical application of HALO skills across a five-hospital emergency medicine (EM) network.
methodsA faculty needs assessment and departmental quality data informed the creation of a 4-hour procedural curriculum course. The blended curriculum included asynchronous precourse procedural guides and videos followed by a 4-hour, in-person deliberate practice session led by peer EM faculty instructors. Year one procedures included cricothyroidotomy, transvenous pacing, catheter thoracostomy, neonatal resuscitation, and peritonsillar abscess drainage. Year two curriculum included fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation, pediatric airway management, ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis, intraosseous access, lateral canthotomy, balloon tamponade of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, fascia iliaca nerve block, and orthopedic reduction/splinting. All stations used clinical equipment stocked across the enterprise. Anonymous pre- and post-course surveys measured self-reported procedural confidence and global course satisfaction. Procedure billing data and faculty self-report were used to evaluate clinical application.
resultsIn year one, 62 of 90 (69%) participants completed surveys which demonstrated significant increases in confidence across all procedures (P < .01) with high satisfaction (median 5, IQR 5-5). Year two results were similar: 67 of 87 (77%) completed surveys, again showing significant confidence gains (P < .01) and high satisfaction (median 5, IQR 5-5). Seventy percent (47 of 67) of year two respondents were returning participants; among them, 68% reported performing at least one procedure reviewed in year one. All reported increased confidence during clinical performance. Peritonsillar abscess drainage increased from 14 procedures precourse to 133 in year one and 83 in year two, with 35% performed in regional hospitals. We observed no change in procedure-related quality incidents.
conclusionOur faculty procedural curriculum offers a framework that emergency departments can use to support faculty in increasing confidence in performing HALO and other low-frequency procedures. Future research should evaluate the durability of this educational approach, including how long the intervention preserves procedural confidence without decay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.