ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Syphilis Screening in Pregnancy During Emergency Department Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCongenital syphilis is rising in the United States, especially among infants born to women with limited prenatal care. Emergency departments (ED) offer opportunities for early detection, particularly among patients evaluated for urogenital sexually transmitted infection (STI) concerns. In October 2019, our health system implemented an ED STI order set that promoted HIV co-testing and included a preselected option for syphilis testing. In this study, we evaluated change in syphilis testing during the post-implementation period among ED encounters with both pregnancy and gonorrhea/chlamydia (GC/CT) testing.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, quasi-experimental study across 20 EDs, using health record data from 2018 to 2023 for patients aged 15-44 years who received both pregnancy and GC/CT testing. We measured annual syphilis and HIV testing and positivity, stratified by pregnancy status. The primary study outcome was syphilis testing during the encounter; HIV testing and detection outcomes were secondary.
resultsAmong 59,171 ED encounters with pregnancy and GC/CT testing, 5,178 (8.8%) involved pregnant patients, and 9,538 (16.1%) received syphilis testing. Syphilis testing among pregnant patients increased from .9% in 2018 to 46.1% in 2023 (+45.1 percentage points [95% CI, 40.4-49.6]). Testing among nonpregnant patients rose from 1.2% to 35.9% (+34.6 percentage points [95% CI, 33.3-35.9]). Overall, only 1,068 of 5,178 pregnant encounters received a syphilis test (20.6%). Among 1,068 syphilis-tested pregnant encounters, 15 (1.4%) were treponemal-positive and 9 (.8%; 843 per 100,000 tested) met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance definition for active syphilis (approximately 1 per 119 tests). Using all pregnant encounters with GC/CT testing as the denominator, the encounter-based active syphilis rate was 173.8 per 100,000 (.17%). HIV testing increased similarly (pregnant: .4% in 2018 to 44.5% in 2023), while HIV positivity remained rare (2 pregnant; 13 overall).
conclusionSyphilis testing and case detection increased during the postimplementation period following introduction of a preselected STI order set in the electronic health record. Many encounters in the analytic cohort still did not include syphilis testing. These findings support the ED as an important setting for identifying syphilis in pregnancy while underscoring the need for further work to understand remaining testing gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.