ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Standardized Exam of the Abdomen Protocol Through Telemedicine in the Emergency Department.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAbdominal pain is a common emergency department (ED) presentation, and virtual assessment of such complaints remains a challenge due to the limitations of remote physical examination. The standardized exam of the abdomen protocol (SEAP) was developed to guide patients in performing a self-abdominal examination during telemedicine consultations. We aimed to evaluate agreement between patient-performed abdominal self-examinations using the SEAP and physician-performed abdominal examinations.
methodsWe conducted a prospective, single-center study at the American University of Beirut Medical Center ED in Lebanon from August 2023-August 2024. Adult patients who presented with abdominal pain and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Each patient performed a video-guided abdominal self-examination by following a brief instructional video (SEAP). The SEAP was developed by an emergency medicine faculty at our institution using pre-established abdominal examination principles and clinical practice frameworks. The protocol was translated into a structured, two-minute instructional video. Blinded abdominal examinations were then performed by an emergency medicine resident and an attending physician. The primary outcome was agreement in abdominal tenderness across seven predefined regions, assessed using the Cohen kappa coefficient. Patient experience and feasibility measures were also collected.
resultsWe included a total of 103 patients. Agreement between patient-performed and physician-performed examinations was slight to fair across six of the seven abdominal regions (κ range, .13-.41). The highest agreement was observed in the right lower quadrant, with fair agreement between patients and residents (κ = .47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.64) and patients and attending physicians (κ = .36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.53). Agreement in the remaining regions, including the upper quadrants and flanks, remained low; right upper quadrant (κ = .13), left upper quadrant (κ = .28), and flanks (κ range, -0.04 to .41). Most patients (97.9%; n = 94/96) rated the instructional video as clear and easy to follow.
conclusionPatient-performed abdominal self-examination using the SEAP demonstrated limited agreement with physician examinations across most abdominal regions. Agreement in the right lower quadrant was also fair. These findings indicate that patient-performed abdominal self-examination does not reliably reproduce physician assessment. However, they provide a foundation for further studies aimed at refining and better defining the role of patient-guided abdominal examinations in telemedicine settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.