ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Impact of Street Medicine on Emergency Department Use: A Three-Year Evaluation of People Experiencing Homelessness.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeople experiencing homelessness (PEH) frequently utilize the emergency department (ED) for acute and primary healthcare needs. Loyola Street Medicine is a multidisciplinary team comprised of physicians, students, and other professionals who provide weekly healthcare services to PEH at a train station in Chicago. The objective of the study was to identify the specific patient demographics, chief complaints, and clinical interventions associated with increased odds of these patients reporting that they would have sought care at an ED had Loyola Street Medicine been unavailable.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients seen by Loyola Street Medicine between September 2021 and September 2024, with 2,121 total encounters and a subset of 1,565 with identifying data. The primary outcome measure was whether the patient reported they would have gone to the ED for care, and the secondary outcome measures were patient demographics, chief complaints, and interventions provided. We estimated odds ratios with univariable logistic regression mixed models, with random intercept accounting for multiple patient visits in the subset of patients with identifiers.
resultsFor 63% of all encounters (N = 1,293), people experiencing homelessness indicated they would have gone to the ED without street medicine, with the most common demographics including Black race (77%), male sex (80%), and a mean age of 46.7 years. Among patients who indicated they would have gone to the ED, the most prevalent chief complaints were wound check (22%), musculoskeletal issues (17%), and podiatry concerns (14%). Black and "other" race patients had decreased odds of indicating they would have gone to the ED compared to White patients (0.69 [95% CI, 0.49-0.97], P = .03 and 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.69], P = .001, respectively). Patients with wound-related complaints and those needing wound care as an intervention had greater odds of indicating they would go to the ED versus any other location such as a clinic or a primary care physician (1.46 [95% CI, 1.07-1.99], P = .02 and 1.5 [95% CI, 1.11-2.03], P = .009, respectively).
conclusionThe findings demonstrate that street medicine can play a vital role in addressing the complex needs of people experiencing homelessness. By providing consistent, low-barrier care, street medicine has the potential to reduce nonemergent ED use and improve continuity of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.