ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Cost Savings from Emergency Department Chest Pain Patient Evaluation: A Monte Carlo Simulation.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChest pain patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) often require risk stratification through stress testing, which may necessitate hospitalization. This practice contributes to ED crowding by occupying beds with low-risk patients who may derive limited benefit from testing, thereby increasing bed occupancy, prolonging ED boarding times, amplifying crowding, and resource strain. Use of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven clinical decision support tool improves the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease and focuses diagnostic testing on those most likely to benefit.
methodsWe created a Monte Carlo simulation informed by available published inputs and ran 1,000 trials to estimate the national impact of using an AI-driven decision-support tool to reduce avoidable downstream cardiac testing among eligible U.S. ED patients with chest pain. Model inputs included patient demographics, chest pain history, electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, medication use, and lab values (including some nonroutine tests). Our primary outcome was U.S. annual cost savings from reclassifying eligible ED patients using an AI-driven decision-support tool. Secondary outcomes included reductions in short-stay hospitalizations, cancer cases, and cancer deaths due to averted radiation exposure.
resultsUniversal adoption of an AI-driven decision-support tool was estimated to save a mean (standard deviation) of $675 million ($340 million) by avoiding 688,000 (147,000) downstream cardiac diagnostic tests. This resulted in annual decreases of 537,000 (115,000) hospitalizations, 8.30 million (1.96 million) bed hours, 490 (150) new cancer diagnoses, and 250 (80) cancer deaths.
conclusionAssuming similar recategorization of patients seen in a European outpatient cohort, widespread adoption of an AI-driven clinical decision-support tool to evaluate U.S. ED patients with suspected obstructive coronary disease could yield substantial benefits by reducing avoidable downstream cardiac testing. By accurately identifying patients who do not require urgent diagnostics, this approach could help mitigate crowding, relieve resource strain, and improve patient flow-supporting a more efficient emergency care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.