Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42900795›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2026

From Person to Patient: Power, Control and the Construction of Vulnerability in the Operating Room.

Mirko Prosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mirko ProsenFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Izola, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9943-9037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The operating room is a highly organised clinical environment in which patients experience a shift from autonomous individuals to dependent recipients of care. This transformation is often regarded as a clinical necessity, but it is also actively shaped by everyday practices, organisational structures and professional interactions. This study explored how healthcare professionals interpret mechanisms of power, control and patient vulnerability in the operating room. A qualitative design was used, employing semi-structured interviews with 32 healthcare professionals (13 perioperative nurses, 6 nurse anaesthetists and 13 surgeons) from a general hospital. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were identified: (1) From person to patient: loss of control and transformation in the operating room; (2) The body as object: routinised practice and negotiated authority; and (3) Ethics under pressure: dignity and vulnerability in everyday practice. The findings show that patient vulnerability is not only a consequence of clinical condition but also actively produced through routine practices, hierarchical relations and organisational priorities. Anaesthesia emerged as a critical turning point, where attention shifts from the person to the procedure. Although these practices are often normalised as necessary for efficiency and safety, they may contribute to reduced patient visibility and agency.

Indexed as

Operating RoomsPower, PsychologicalHumansQualitative Researchclinical practiceinterprofessional relationsorganisational dynamicspatient experienceperioperative care

Identifiers

PMID42900795
PMCPMC13682684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.