ArticleHuman molecular genetics2026
Droplet digital PCR as a first-line detection tool in the genetic diagnosis of vascular anomalies.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Targeted precision therapies are increasingly used in the treatment of individuals with vascular anomalies (VAs). This increases the need for rapid, accurate and inexpensive genetic diagnosis. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is an alternative to next-generation sequencing (NGS), permitting rapid, highly sensitive interrogation of recurrent pathogenic mosaic variants. We examined the feasibility of ddPCR as a primary diagnostic tool in a large cohort of individuals with VAs. Lesional tissue was collected for ddPCR of up to 46 recurrent pathogenic variants across 16 genes associated with VAs. Specimens were assessed on a subset of assays for each individual based on clinical phenotype. Most individuals who had negative ddPCR results went on to high-depth gene panel or deep exome NGS, or Sanger sequencing. Here we report the phenotypic and molecular findings for 78 newly recruited and tested individuals in addition to the 60 individuals already reported from our cohort. The overall diagnostic yield for our cohort when combined with individuals previously reported was 104/138 (75%). Of 138 individuals tested, recurrent pathogenic variants were detected in 71 (51%) on ddPCR. Variants were most frequently identified in PIK3CA (n = 28), TEK (n = 18), GNAQ (n = 12), or MAP2K1 (n = 7). In a further 33 individuals, pathogenic variants were identified on NGS or Sanger sequencing. Our findings indicate that ddPCR is an efficient method achieving a high diagnostic yield in our cohort when used prior to sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.