Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42900660›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Evidence-based practice implementation and associated factors among nurses employed at public hospitals in Siltie Zone, South Central Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.

Sadik Seid Ahmed, Altayework Mekonnen Gebresillassie, Tigist Tsegaye Bekele, Habtamu Ayalew Mekonnen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sadik Seid AhmedSaint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College School of Nursing Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Altayework Mekonnen GebresillassieSaint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College School of Nursing Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tigist Tsegaye BekeleSaint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College School of Nursing Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Habtamu Ayalew MekonnenSaint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College School of Nursing Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3912-0580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of the best available research evidence in clinical decision-making through the incorporation of clinical experience and patient preferences into the delivery of professional patient care is known as evidence-based practice. The best way to provide high-quality care that is secure and has positive results is through evidence-based practice. To use evidence-based practice. Despite the anticipated advantages of evidence-based practice, nurses have found it challenging to implement.

objectivesTo assess the implementation of evidence-based practice and related factors among nurses working in public hospitals in the Siltie Zone in South Central Ethiopia in 2023.

methodsAn institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 6 to April 5, 2023, to assess the implementation of evidence-based practice. A sample size was 337 nurses working in Siltie Zone public hospitals; a self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire was used for data collection. Data was cleaned, coded, and entered into EpiData version 4.6 before being exported and analyzed in SPSS (version 26). To ascertain the relationship between the outcome variable and the predictors, binary logistic regression was performed, and those with a p-value of < 0.25 were entered into multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) was calculated to determine the association between the dependent and independent variables at a 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultAccording to this study, 147 (45.5%) of nurses have good evidence-based practice implementation, and 176 (54.5%) of nurses were found to have poor evidence-based practice implementation. Factors significantly associated with implementation of evidence-based practice were age between 26 and 30 (AOR = 5.247, 95% CI: 1.249, 22.047); educational level, BSc (AOR = 1.956, 95% CI: 1.035, 3.698) and masters (AOR = 4.149, 95% CI: 1.088, 15.817); working unit like emergency (AOR = 3.935, 95% CI: 1.300, 11.914) and inpatient (AOR = 4.684, 95% CI: 1.633, 13.435); ability to formulate a question (AOR = 1.844, 95% CI: 1.062, 3.201); and not relevant to the nursing profession (AOR = 0.459, 95% CI:  .236,  .878).

conclusionThis study showed that the majority of nurses implement evidence-based practice ineffectively. Age, educational level, working unit, question formulation, and the applicability of evidence-based practice to nursing professions were the main causes of inadequate implementation of evidence-based practice. Therefore, multi-stakeholder approaches are required to address the main contributing variables and promote the implementation of evidence-based practice.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeHospitals, PublicNursesNursing Staff, HospitalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42900660
PMCPMC13682656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.