Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42900554›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Synthetic MRI from radiotherapy planning CT images for Head-and-Neck Cancer.

Prabhakar Ramachandran, Akshay C Dhargave, Catherine Jones, Dionee Liefman, Lachlan McDowell, Howard Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prabhakar RamachandranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5023-1558
Akshay C DhargaveDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Catherine JonesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Dionee LiefmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Lachlan McDowellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Howard LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputed Tomography (CT) provides geometric accuracy and electron density information essential for radiotherapy planning; however, it offers limited soft-tissue contrast. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) improves tumor visualization but introduces registration uncertainties when acquired separately from the radiotherapy planning CT (pCT). Cross-modality image synthesis enables the generation of synthetic MRI (sMRI) directly from pCT and may combine the strengths of both modalities, reducing reliance on MRI access. PURPOSE: We propose a two-stage deep-learning framework for generating sMRI from pCT image-sets specifically in head-and-neck (H&N) cancers, providing soft-tissue contrast comparable to ground-truth MR images (gtMRI).

methodsThis study included 60 patient cases with H&N cancer treated with radical radiotherapy between March 2022 and April 2024 for model development (50 for training, 10 for validation), plus 10 additional cases, independent of the development cohort for testing. All patients underwent a standard, non-contrast pCT scan followed by an MRI acquired on a 3T Siemens MR simulator. Images were deformably-registered, yielding 10,000 matched CT-MRI slice-pairs for model training. The proposed model utilizes a two-stage architecture, a Pix2Pix conditional generative adversarial network (GAN) for coarse sMRI synthesis, followed by a conditional diffusion model for refinement. To test the model's robustness, 10 patient cases with both pCT and contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) were used to generate sMRI. Model performance was assessed using structural similarity index (SSIM), multi-scale structural similarity index (MS-SSIM), mean absolute error (MAE), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). In addition, the geometric agreement of the primary (GTVp_70) and nodal (GTVn_70) gross tumor volumes delineated on sMRI vs. gtMRI was independently assessed by two radiation oncologists (ROs) using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95

resultsThe average MS-SSIM, SSIM, MAE and PSNR for pCT-derived sMRI were 0.82 ± 0.02, 0.70 ± 0.03, 0.05 ± 0.01, and 20.42 ± 0.66 dB, respectively. The mean MS-SSIM and SSIM values for ceCT-derived sMRI were 0.02 lower than those for the corresponding pCT-to-sMRI metrics. For the contour-based evaluation, sMRI-derived GTV contours achieved a mean DSC of 0.56 and 0.60 for GTVp_70, and 0.72 and 0.74 for GTVn_70 across the two ROs, relative to gtMRI contours.

conclusionOur proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility of pCT-derived sMRI for H&N cancers using a deep-learning framework. The model produces grayscale patterns and soft-tissue contrast that closely resemble the gtMRI.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHead and Neck NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansMaleRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulateddeep‐learningHead‐and‐Neck Cancerimage translationPix2PixGANradiotherapy planningSynthetic MRI

Identifiers

PMID42900554
PMCPMC13682624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.