Trial reportScandinavian journal of primary health care2027
A structured framework for assessment of rehabilitation and sick-listing (STARS) - experiences among healthcare professionals.
Trial report in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeThe sick-listing process is often perceived uncertain and unclear by both patients and staff. To improve the process, a framework for structured assessment of rehabilitation and sick-listing (STARS) has been developed in the South-Eastern Healthcare Region in Sweden. STARS consists of seven methodological tools supporting healthcare professionals in sick-listing and rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to investigate how primary healthcare staff clinically involved in the sick leave process experience working according to STARS.
methodWe used a qualitative design conducting focus group discussions (
resultThe participants' experience of working according to STARS were described by the overarching theme 'STARS as an enabling structure' formed by three themes and eight subthemes. The themes were 'Clearer roles and responsibilities through the RECO function', 'Moving from individual work to teamwork' and 'A more active and personalized rehabilitation and sick-listing process'.
conclusionThe findings suggest that implementing the STARS framework may provide a supportive structure for a uniform and consistent way of working across primary healthcare centers. By clarifying RECOs' roles and strengthening interprofessional collaboration, the framework may support a more patient-centered approach across services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.