Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42900449›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026

Fatigue in head and neck cancer survivors after radiotherapy - prevalence, risk factors, and radiation dose correlates.

Valentin Magnus, Sebastian Schäfer, Marcus Tyyger, Zsuzsanna Iyizoba-Ebozue, David Unger, Anna-Maria Tews, Anna Boide, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Clemens Seidel, Christos Moustakis and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Valentin MagnusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian SchäferDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3790-3278
Marcus TyygerMedical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK.
Zsuzsanna Iyizoba-EbozueLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
David UngerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Anna-Maria TewsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Anna BoideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Anja Mehnert-TheuerkaufComprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Clemens SeidelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christos MoustakisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Nils Henrik NicolayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Alexander RühleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. alexander.ruehle@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2022-897X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the prevalence of fatigue in head and neck cancer survivors and identify associated factors, including potential associations with radiation dose to cerebral organs at risk (OAR).

methodsThis cross-sectional observational study included survivors treated with curative radiotherapy between 2005 and 2023 at a tertiary cancer center. Fatigue and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Dosimetric analyses evaluated associations between fatigue and radiation dose to intracranial OAR (brainstem, cerebellum, posterior fossa, medulla, pituitary gland, basal ganglia, hippocampus), including voxel-based analysis (VBA).

resultsOne hundred fifty-eight patients were included. The most common tumor site was the oropharynx (38.6%). Median time from radiotherapy completion to study participation was 41 (IQR, 22-61) months. The mean fatigue score was 44.7 (SD, 28.0), exceeding the fatigue levels in the age- and sex-adjusted German general population (29.7); 51.3% of patients showed clinically relevant fatigue (≥ 39 points). Fatigue was inversely associated with HRQoL (ρ = - 0.59, p < 0.001), and positively with distress (ρ = 0.54, p < 0.001) and fear of cancer recurrence (ρ = 0.41, p < 0.001). Higher fatigue was found in patients with impaired performance status and in those with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Neither cerebral OAR radiation doses nor skeletal muscle mass index was associated with fatigue, and VBA revealed no relevant subregions.

conclusionsClinically relevant fatigue affects about half of head and neck cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The absence of a correlation with cerebral OAR doses suggests that other, probably multifactorial somatic, psychological and lifestyle-related factors play a more central role in the genesis of fatigue than the radiation-related brain exposures investigated.

Indexed as

Fear of cancer progressionHead and neck squamous cell carcinomaPsycho-oncologyQuality of lifeSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID42900449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.