ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Comparison of the safety and 24-36-month efficacy of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) with isolated medial-compartment knee osteoarthritis.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The number of very elderly patients presenting with end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) is rising rapidly, yet the comparative merits of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in this group remain insufficiently characterised. We compared the perioperative safety and short-term clinical and patient-reported efficacy of the two procedures in patients aged 75 years and older with isolated medial-compartment OA. This single-centre retrospective cohort study compared patients aged ≥ 75 years undergoing primary medial UKA or TKA for isolated medial-compartment OA between January 2018 and December 2022. Among 268 eligible patients (68 UKA and 200 TKA), 1:2 nearest-neighbour propensity-score matching, incorporating operating surgeon together with demographic, comorbidity, radiographic and baseline functional covariates, yielded 60 UKA and 120 TKA patients. Perioperative outcomes, KSS, OKS, pain VAS, ROM, postoperative FJS-12, complications, readmission, reoperation and satisfaction were compared over 24-36 months. Standardised mean differences assessed baseline balance; treatment-effect estimates, risk differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Matching yielded 180 patients, with all post-match absolute SMDs < 0.10 (maximum 0.087). UKA was associated with shorter operative time (64.3 vs. 84.2 min), lower estimated blood loss (99.9 vs. 183.6 mL), smaller haemoglobin decline (1.5 vs. 2.6 g/dL), shorter stay (3.0 vs. 5.2 days) and earlier independent walking (18.3 vs. 29.6 h). Final KSS components were similar; UKA showed higher OKS and FJS-12, greater knee flexion and lower pain VAS. Complications occurred in 3/60 UKA (5.0%) and 19/120 TKA (15.8%; risk difference - 10.8% points, 95% CI - 19.4 to - 2.3; sensitivity-analysis adjusted OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.09-0.92). Transfusion was infrequent (1.7% vs. 3.3%); readmission and reoperation showed no clear difference. Final satisfaction was 98.3% versus 86.7% (risk difference + 11.7% points, 95% CI 4.8-18.6). In carefully selected patients aged ≥ 75 years with isolated medial-compartment OA, medial UKA was associated with lower measured perioperative burden and more favourable patient-reported outcomes than TKA over 24-36 months. The observed difference in complications should be interpreted cautiously because event counts were small and findings were sensitive to the choice of statistical test. Retrospective allocation, surgeon and implant heterogeneity, potential residual confounding and limited follow-up preclude causal or long-term durability conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42900442What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.