Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42900429›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2026

Beyond medical care: public health insurance, caloric intake, and labor productivity in rural China.

Yunze Han, Kei Kajisa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yunze HanGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Oiwake-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan. han.yunze.57i@st.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6268-6986
Kei KajisaGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Oiwake-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9062-7303

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJSP2110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on public health insurance (PHI) and human capital has focused on direct pathways through which increased medical utilization improves human health capital. However, a possible indirect pathway may also exist: PHI may expand the budget for nonmedical expenditures, some of which are important human capital inputs. This study uses the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NRCMS) to examine whether two empirical associations are consistent with a potential indirect pathway: NRCMS participation is associated with higher individual caloric intake, and caloric intake is associated with subsequent labor productivity.

methodsUsing unbalanced panel data from the 2009 and 2011 waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey, we examined two hypotheses: NRCMS participation is associated with higher individual caloric intake, and higher caloric intake is associated with higher productivity, as measured by earnings per working day. We used propensity score matching for the first hypothesis and inverse probability weighting regression for the second hypothesis.

resultsNRCMS participation was associated with approximately 294 kcal/day higher caloric intake. A caloric difference of this magnitude was associated with 2.97%-3.91% higher labor productivity in rural China in the late 2000s.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that nonmedical consumption may be a relevant pathway linking public health insurance to human capital in low-income rural settings. While causal interpretation remains limited, they underscore the importance of examining the broader human capital implications of health insurance beyond health outcomes.

Indexed as

Caloric intakeHuman capitalLabor productivityPublic health insuranceRural China

Identifiers

PMID42900429
PMCPMC13682103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.