ReviewDiscover nano2026
Nanomedicines based on renewable materials for sustainable drug delivery and biomedical imaging applications.
Review in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the application of nanoscale materials, nanomedicine is redefining and improving the delivery of pharmaceuticals and molecular bioimaging probes, providing novel approaches to disease diagnosis, management, and treatment. As in many other fields, renewable materials are becoming increasingly important in nanomedicine because they offer sustainable alternatives to fossil-based resources and are often biodegradable and biocompatible. Additionally, these materials are replenishable in nature, and some can be derived or recovered from industrial and agro-industrial waste streams. In this review, we critically evaluate nanomedicines fabricated from renewable polymers, polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids for drug delivery and biomedical imaging, together with their physicochemical and biological characterization. Particular emphasis is placed on how material origin and physicochemical properties influence formulation performance and clinical readiness. Rather than considering renewable origin alone as an indicator of translational suitability, the major material classes are compared in terms of source consistency, biodegradability, imaging functionality, and regulatory maturity. Recent developments reported during 2020-2026 are discussed, with particular attention to the objectives and key findings of the developed nanomedicines. Additionally, their applications in the treatment of various diseases and in biomedical imaging are reviewed. The review also highlights key translational barriers, and evidence gaps that must be addressed to advance renewable material-based nanomedicines from proof-of-concept systems toward reproducible, scalable, and clinically relevant products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.