ArticleNeuroradiology2026
An enlarged nonfistulous artery mimicking an additional feeder in a pediatric pial arteriovenous fistula: an angiographic pitfall.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pial arteriovenous fistulas (PAVFs) are rare high-flow vascular lesions requiring precise characterization of the fistulous angioarchitecture before treatment. We report a pediatric PAVF in which an enlarged artery adjacent to the fistula initially appeared suspicious for additional fistulous supply. Superselective angiography demonstrated normal cortical arterial arborization and parenchymal perfusion without early venous drainage, confirming that the enlarged vessel did not participate directly in the arteriovenous shunt. Selective coil embolization achieved complete immediate occlusion of the fistulous communication while preserving the adjacent normal cortical arterial supply. This case illustrates that arterial enlargement alone does not establish participation in a PAVF and highlights an angiographic pitfall relevant to treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42900393What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.