Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42900351›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2026

Vibostolimab Coformulated with Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Jacob Sands, Shun Lu, Joachim G Aerts, Martin Reck, Alejandro Navarro, Talia Shentzer Kutiel, Nir Peled, Ignacio Casarini, Samuel J Kerr, Toshiaki Takahashi and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05224141 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of MK-7684A in Combination With Etoposide and Platinum Followed by MK-7684A vs Atezolizumab in Combination With Etoposide and Platinum Followed by Atezolizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Participants With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05224141 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of MK-7684A in Combination With Etoposide and Platinum Followed by MK-7684A vs Atezolizumab in Combination With Etoposide and Platinum Followed by Atezolizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Participants With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (KEYVIBE-008)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2022 to 2027Enrolled460ConditionsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaArmsPembrolizumab/Vibostolimab Co-Formulation, Saline placebo, Etoposide, Cisplatin, Atezolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jacob SandsLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215-5450, USA. jacob_sands@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4663-7464
Shun LuShanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Joachim G AertsPulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Martin ReckDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Lungenclinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Alejandro NavarroVall d'Hebron Institut d'Oncology and Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
Talia Shentzer KutielInstitute of Oncology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Nir PeledThe Institute of Oncology, Shaare Zedek Cancer Centre and Ben-Gurion University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ignacio CasariniHospital Bernardo Houssay, Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Samuel J KerrAnn B. Barshinger Cancer Institute, Penn Medicine, Lancaster, PA, USA.
Toshiaki TakahashiDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ahmet BiliciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ying ChengJilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China.
Mengzhao WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine and Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Shin Yup LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Anna ŁowczakDepartment of Pulmonology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.
Julien MazieresPulmonology Department, Toulouse University Hospital and Centre de Recherche Cancérologie Toulouse CRCT, INSERM, Toulouse, France.
Haixia HuMSD (China) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Jianyu WuMerck & Co., Inc., Upper Gwynedd, PA, USA.
Himani AggarwalMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Hazem El-OstaMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Luis Paz-AresDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVibostolimab, an anti-T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT) antibody, showed antitumor activity with pembrolizumab in non-small-cell lung cancer.

objectiveThe KEYVIBE-008 study evaluated vibostolimab coformulated with pembrolizumab (vibostolimab/pembrolizumab) plus etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy (EP) versus atezolizumab plus EP as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

methodsParticipants aged ≥18 years with untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer were randomized 1:1 to vibostolimab/pembrolizumab (200 mg each) or atezolizumab (1200 mg) every 3 weeks, with EP and cisplatin/carboplatin for the first four cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The prespecified interim analysis included a non-binding futility analysis of overall survival (futility threshold for actual number of events, P = 0.4816).

resultsFour hundred and sixty participants were randomized (both arms, n = 230). Median time from randomization to data cutoff (4 June, 2024) was 16.6 (range 11.3‒26.1) months. The prespecified futility criterion for overall survival was met (hazard ratio 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.00‒1.59; P = 0.9762). There was no difference in progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.82‒1.23) or objective response rates (71.7% with vibostolimab/pembrolizumab vs 74.8% with atezolizumab). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66.8% of participants treated with vibostolimab/pembrolizumab and 57.2% treated with atezolizumab. Immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 39.3% and 29.7% of participants, respectively.

conclusionsIn this interim analysis of vibostolimab/pembrolizumab plus EP versus atezolizumab plus EP as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer, the prespecified futility criterion for overall survival was met. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events and immune-mediated adverse events were more frequent with vibostolimab/pembrolizumab versus atezolizumab. Given the overall benefit/risk profile, treatment with vibostolimab/pembrolizumab was discontinued. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT05224141.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.