ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Assist team self-efficacy, training needs, and operative outcomes in single-port robotic hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a mixed-methods study to inform protocol development.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-port (SP) robotic surgery imposes unique spatial and technical constraints on bedside assistance personnel; however, structured training protocols for hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) procedures are lacking. A cross-sectional survey using a 7-item Likert self-efficacy instrument was administered to 11 operating room nurses and 19 physician assistants (PAs). Free-text responses were subjected to inductive thematic analysis. Retrospective data from 92 SP robotic HPB cases performed between august 2024 and July 2025 were analyzed. PAs were grouped according to seniority into Group 1 (≥ 5 years) and Group 2 (< 5 years). A cross-sectional survey using a 7-item Likert self-efficacy instrument was administered to 11 operating room nurses and 19 physician assistants (PAs). Free-text responses were subjected to inductive thematic analysis. Retrospective data from 92 SP robotic HPB cases performed between august 2024 and July 2025 were analyzed. PAs were grouped according to seniority into Group 1 (≥ 5 years) and Group 2 (< 5 years). Emergency response and instrument exchange were identified as key areas requiring training. A structured, six-module SP robotic HPB-assist training curriculum was proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.