ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2026
Transcriptomics analysis and experimental assay to screen prognostic genes of N6-methyladenosine RNA methylation related to cuproptosis in colorectal cancer.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cuproptosis and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation have been identified as significant factors in cancer. Consequently, we seek to uncover m6A RNA methylation-related prognostic genes that are correlated with cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and develop an effective prognostic model. Based on public datasets, differential expression analysis, correlation analysis, and machine learning were conducted to identify prognostic genes. Subsequently, a prognostic model was constructed and validated. Furthermore, independent predictive markers were found through the use of clinical characteristics and risk score, to establish a prognostic nomogram. Prognostic gene expression in CRC and normal samples was evaluated using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). According to the prognostic genes, potential drugs for CRC were predicted using artificial intelligence drug design (AIDD) and computer-aided drug design (CADD). A prognostic model was developed utilizing 7 m6A RNA methylation-related prognostic genes that were significantly correlated with CRGs (MMP1, TIMP1, SNAI1, CDC25C, XRN2, COX5A, and FBXL5) in CRC. Survival analysis uncovered a notable contrast in survival outcomes between the high- and low-risk groups. The nomogram constructed based on age, stage, T stage, and risk scores demonstrated good predictive ability. RT-qPCR results showed that MMP1, TIMP1, SNAI1, and CDC25C were upregulated in CRC samples, while COX5A was downregulated, consistent with the bioinformatics analysis results. Furthermore, 186 candidate drugs targeting COX5A were identified, 153 of which showed better predicted binding affinity than the positive-control ligand 3,5‑diiodo‑L‑thyronine. Our analysis sets the groundwork for a more comprehensive comprehension of the fundamental molecular pathways involved in CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42900322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.