ArticleJournal of community genetics2026
Young adults' understanding of, and reaction to, those with uncertain genetic results.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenetic advances increase the likelihood that children may receive uncertain diagnoses such as cystic fibrosis screen positive inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID) from newborn screening. Research suggests a profound impact on parents. Research is needed to understand the impact on the child, especially at key developmental points such as young adulthood, when identity forms. As young adults (YA) are influenced by peer reactions, this novel study explored YAs' sensemaking of CFSPID, and their hypothetical reactions to peers or romantic partners with CFSPID.
methodsFour focus groups were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis across three sections: understanding, peer and romantic relationships.
resultsUnderstanding: Without knowledge about CFSPID, participants used cystic fibrosis, genetic and contagious illness knowledge to form assumptions. Peer and romantic relationships: In both sections, YAs wanted to support their friend/partner; however, their responses revealed assumptions that a person with CFSPID would need more physical and psychological support and would be seen differently by some. Most wanted to learn more but were unsure whether it was appropriate to ask the person with CFPSID. Although rare, some reported they would avoid romantic relationships with YAs with CFSPID. All data suggesting people with CFPSID would be treated differently was based on erroneous assumptions due to a lack of CFSPID knowledge. Providing information about how CFPSID is different from CF did not appear sufficient to stop a reliance on CF knowledge when making sense of CFSPID.
conclusionFurther research should explore whether it's possible to change assumptions when YAs disclose uncertain results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.