Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42900290›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2026

Young adults' understanding of, and reaction to, those with uncertain genetic results.

Fiona Ulph, Kate Fifield, Grace Christie, Eleanor Horowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fiona UlphManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. fiona.ulph@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3590-6542
Kate FifieldManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Grace ChristieManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Eleanor HorowitzManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic advances increase the likelihood that children may receive uncertain diagnoses such as cystic fibrosis screen positive inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID) from newborn screening. Research suggests a profound impact on parents. Research is needed to understand the impact on the child, especially at key developmental points such as young adulthood, when identity forms. As young adults (YA) are influenced by peer reactions, this novel study explored YAs' sensemaking of CFSPID, and their hypothetical reactions to peers or romantic partners with CFSPID.

methodsFour focus groups were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis across three sections: understanding, peer and romantic relationships.

resultsUnderstanding: Without knowledge about CFSPID, participants used cystic fibrosis, genetic and contagious illness knowledge to form assumptions. Peer and romantic relationships: In both sections, YAs wanted to support their friend/partner; however, their responses revealed assumptions that a person with CFSPID would need more physical and psychological support and would be seen differently by some. Most wanted to learn more but were unsure whether it was appropriate to ask the person with CFPSID. Although rare, some reported they would avoid romantic relationships with YAs with CFSPID. All data suggesting people with CFPSID would be treated differently was based on erroneous assumptions due to a lack of CFSPID knowledge. Providing information about how CFPSID is different from CF did not appear sufficient to stop a reliance on CF knowledge when making sense of CFSPID.

conclusionFurther research should explore whether it's possible to change assumptions when YAs disclose uncertain results.

Indexed as

Newborn screeningPeerQualitative methodsUncertain resultsYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID42900290
PMCPMC13683284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.